Critics at the Wall Street Journal’s D: All Things Digital conference demanded that Yahoo chief Terry Semel explain… once again… the rationale for collaborating with Chinese authorities in ways that result in sending non-violent political protestors to long jail sentences.

They asked… once again… if Yahoo would have helped Nazi Germany the same way.

Semel patiently explained… once again… that he’s simply a businessman following local laws.

Adding an extra dollop of sleazy moral equivalency, he weasled, “I don’t feel good about what’s happening in China today. I don’t feel good about some of the things that happen in our own country.”

…And anyway, it’s not Yahoo collaborating. It’s Yahoo’s majority partner.

That evasion is more than blogger Dan Gilmor can stand. Labeling Yahoo a handmaiden to the dictators, he fumes, “It insults people’s intelligence; Yahoo’s name is on the service, after all.”

Surely Yahoo, as the effective franchisor, has something to say about its franchisee’s activities. And Semel does.

He feels bad.

Would he collaborate the same way with the Nazis?

Semel says, “I dont know how I would have felt then.”
But one thing is certain. He’d feel bad about it.

History may judge Semel and his ilk as greedy Gucci-clad 21st century kin to the Vichy French, who worked hand-in-glove with the Nazis for the “good of France.”

Should that happen, and Semel hears about it, you know he’ll feel bad… at least in public.

Isn’t it funny how tough moral decisions become when there’s money involved?

Email Battles Backgrounder: