The latest update from Microsoft isn’t as much for your protection as for Redmond’s. It changes ActiveX controls in an attempt to avoid continuing patent infringement.
Microsoft recently lost the court battle with Eolas Technologies over US Patent 5,838,906, Distributed Hypermedia Method For Automatically Invoking External Application Providing Interaction And Display Of Embedded Objects Within A Hypermedia, a.k.a. 906.
Before you start gloating over Yet Another Microsoft Stumble… You’d better read the patent abstract:
A system allowing a user of a web browser to access and execute an embedded program object. The program object is embedded into a hypermedia document much like data objects. Once selected, the program object executes on the user’s computer or may execute on a remote server or additional remote computers in a distributed processing arrangement. After launching the program object, the user can interact with the object as the invention provides for ongoing communication between the client and browser programs.
In other words, 906 technology lets you build interactive browser-embedded apps that are 100% operating system agnostic. The patent also covers most other interactive content, including ActiveX controls, Adobe Reader, Firefox plug-ins, Java applets, QuickTime Player, Windows Media Player, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
As the University of California (UC) tells it, the inventors, Michael Doyle, David Martin and Cheong Ang, assigned the patent to UC in 1994. UC, in turn, offered 906 to Microsoft (and others), to no avail.
Amidst the thundering silence, UC licensed 906 to Doyle’s playpen, Eolas Technologies. Meanwhile, Microsoft embedded the unlicensed technology in Internet Explorer, which was then embedded in Windows.
The result put the hurt to Microsoft competitors, knocking Netscape for a loop, while providing zero patent income for Eolas.
The inventing team finally won some MS-respect when a federal jury awarded them US$520.6 million in 2003, which was followed by thumping reaffirmations of the patent’s standing by both the US Patent Office and the US Supreme Court.
Upshot? Microsoft is overhauling ActiveX. Come May Day, Redmond should have all versions of Windows de-Eolas’d… while continuing to claim this ain’t over till it’s over. Microsoft says that, from now on, ActiveX control activation will require that, “when a web page uses the APPLET, EMBED, or OBJECT elements to load an ActiveX control, the control’s user interface is blocked until the user activates it. If a page uses these elements to load multiple controls, each interactive control must be individually activated.”
By the time it’s all said-and-done, Microsoft will probably have spent around, oh, a zillion bucks for an innovation that might have cost little more than several dozen cappuccinos in 1993.
So how much should Firefox users care?
Eolas-Master Doyle told eWeek that open-sourcers are safe. It seems you have little to worry about… as long as you’re not an 800 pound gorilla in the northwest corner of the United States… Or at least, that’s the way we read it. (If he hadn’t had UC backing him up, Doyle would likely have been NetScaped.)
OK. Now you can gloat.
Email Battles Backgrounder:
- The Five Patents That Brought BlackBerry Down; Email Battles; 08 March 2006
- 5,000 Patent Gorilla; NewsByte; Email Battles; 08 March 2006
- Rogue Patent Office saves Blackberry e-mail; NewsByte; Email Battles; 02 December 2005

12 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 9th, 2006 at 4:29 pm
Ted Johnson
Gates, William - Robber baron was a term revived in the 19th century in the United States as a pejorative reference to businessmen who dominated their respective industries and amassed huge personal fortunes, typically as a direct result of pursuing various anti-competitive or unfair business practices. The term may now be used in relation to any businessman who is perceived to have used questionable business practices in order to become powerful or wealthy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robber_baron_%28industrialist%29)
March 10th, 2006 at 7:06 am
Deive
Firefox plug-ins do not fit the description of the patent, as they are part of the application, NOT the web page (i.e. they are not embedded)
March 10th, 2006 at 9:42 am
Editor
As this is written, EB is getting creamed on digg for using AFFECT instead of EFFECT in the title.
Unfortunately, our detractors are 100% correct.
Apologies to all. It wasn’t ignorance, just poor editorial review.
March 11th, 2006 at 2:36 am
MT
Not another Microsoft Bashing Article! Why not get the facts on Firefox?
www.firefoxmyths.com
March 11th, 2006 at 1:32 pm
Mythbuster
firefoxmyths =
(Seed of truth * Exaggeration) -
deltaTime =
MS-propaganda-about-firefox =
Pfffffffffft.
March 13th, 2006 at 7:59 am
chen
Many M$ patents (5,000) are lamer than Eolas.
http://www.digg.com/technology/How_Microsoft_s_ActiveX
_Fiasco_Unfolded,_and_Its_Affect_On_Firefox
March 29th, 2006 at 11:21 am
francisco vazquez
Hi, I’m worried because of a mail I just received saying that after april 11th all webpages that uses macromedia flash embedded must change code so not to get sued and useres must click over flash objects to load, does anyone know if this is true or false alarm.
Thanks
Francisco V
March 30th, 2006 at 11:36 am
Rich Clark
I’m really glad someone got to take a bunch of money from M$. So my question is, are you going to hand out all that money to the developers that now have to go in and spend hours changing all their code? Thanks a lot. These next couple weeks are gonna be great.
April 1st, 2006 at 6:32 pm
L.T.
Eolas=Yet another patent troll
April 3rd, 2006 at 10:31 am
RD
I have been a web developer now for almost 8 years now. Almost 75% of my projects use Flash technology. I can tell you the work involved on my end for making the necessary code changes to my clients sites is no small task.
Specifically because of this, I am retiring from the web development business as of the end of the month and will be working full-time for a family business.
Good riddens to the web business.
April 4th, 2006 at 8:06 am
Typical Internet User
F**k you Eolas! (and all your dumb a** supporters)
June 20th, 2006 at 6:04 pm
Dave
I really hoped this would be an end to crappy Flash animations, alas not. Microsoft has finally got a taste of its own medicine. Anyone remember the British Telecom patent for hyperlinks filed in the mid 70’s…