<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple kneels to Creative</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1496</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1496</guid>
					<description>Hi TomB and Travis. 
Your points are both well taken, even though Travis needs to spend a little quiet time for uncivil behavior.

I'm not sure where we disagree. If Apple's lawyers thought its position was strong enough to kill CT, I have no doubt that Jobs would have gone for CT's throat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TomB and Travis.<br />
Your points are both well taken, even though Travis needs to spend a little quiet time for uncivil behavior.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where we disagree. If Apple&#8217;s lawyers thought its position was strong enough to kill CT, I have no doubt that Jobs would have gone for CT&#8217;s throat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1493</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1493</guid>
					<description>BJ, you're a moron.  $100M to Apple is pocket-change to make the Creative-flea go away.  I would characterize this as Apple buying Creative's patents for little money, thereby enlarging their muli-billion dollar empire in music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ, you&#8217;re a moron.  $100M to Apple is pocket-change to make the Creative-flea go away.  I would characterize this as Apple buying Creative&#8217;s patents for little money, thereby enlarging their muli-billion dollar empire in music.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TomB</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1492</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/23/0561014001156379406apple-settles-with-creative-for-100-million/#comment-1492</guid>
					<description>Sometimes settling, even if you believe you could have won the case (AAPL probably would have), is the cheaper than drawn out legal battles.

And, as you say:"CT… Now it’s the biggest iPod booster on Planet Earth."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes settling, even if you believe you could have won the case (AAPL probably would have), is the cheaper than drawn out legal battles.</p>
<p>And, as you say:&#8221;CT… Now it’s the biggest iPod booster on Planet Earth.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
