<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Meg (Whitman), I got your Call to Action, and I have a few suggestions.</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: online auctions</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1676</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1676</guid>
					<description>Total absurd! Heads up for http://www.oltiby.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total absurd! Heads up for <a href='http://www.oltiby.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.oltiby.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: online auctions</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1663</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1663</guid>
					<description>Isn't that weird how she never contacted you before and now suddenly she is asking for help? This is actually the way to help eBay and consequently her at the end. She does not care about the internet users. Like she has not other things to do in her life but suddenly she started caring for average people. Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that weird how she never contacted you before and now suddenly she is asking for help? This is actually the way to help eBay and consequently her at the end. She does not care about the internet users. Like she has not other things to do in her life but suddenly she started caring for average people. Please!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1598</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1598</guid>
					<description>OK, BJ, I was a bit tough on you.  But, you see, it was the flippant tone in your post that got up my nose on a bad hair day. Ignoring a problem, as you suggested, is not going to make it go away.

The fact is, the telcos are doing all they can to control our internet experience. That Meg cared enough to do something about it shows she is a better net citizen than those who want to bury their heads in the sand and pretend the problem is not there.

So what if Meg is a gazillionaire? She is another net citizen concerned enough to care about what happens...for all of us. And of course I care too. I make my living off the internet. I spend perhaps too much time surfing the internet finding websites like yours to read ;-)

My point was that unless we join together to fight for our web, we will only have ourselves to blame when it is controlled by big business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, BJ, I was a bit tough on you.  But, you see, it was the flippant tone in your post that got up my nose on a bad hair day. Ignoring a problem, as you suggested, is not going to make it go away.</p>
<p>The fact is, the telcos are doing all they can to control our internet experience. That Meg cared enough to do something about it shows she is a better net citizen than those who want to bury their heads in the sand and pretend the problem is not there.</p>
<p>So what if Meg is a gazillionaire? She is another net citizen concerned enough to care about what happens&#8230;for all of us. And of course I care too. I make my living off the internet. I spend perhaps too much time surfing the internet finding websites like yours to read <img src='http://www.emailbattles.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My point was that unless we join together to fight for our web, we will only have ourselves to blame when it is controlled by big business.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MDH</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1585</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1585</guid>
					<description>BJ, your correct, Zillionaires will be unaffected by a tiered system and they all have hidden agenda's somewhere.  Its us little users who will be squeezed for for capitalistic greed.  We shouldn't waste our typing on Meg or Europeans who want to matter but just cant.  We need to mobilize and write our congressmen and vote OUT the ones who vote agains the people.   Our real enemies are corporate lobbiests.  Fight for what is right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ, your correct, Zillionaires will be unaffected by a tiered system and they all have hidden agenda&#8217;s somewhere.  Its us little users who will be squeezed for for capitalistic greed.  We shouldn&#8217;t waste our typing on Meg or Europeans who want to matter but just cant.  We need to mobilize and write our congressmen and vote OUT the ones who vote agains the people.   Our real enemies are corporate lobbiests.  Fight for what is right!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1525</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1525</guid>
					<description>Hi Doc.
Who could trust it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doc.<br />
Who could trust it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DOC</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1522</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1522</guid>
					<description>But eBay rairly if EVER uses their email system to warn the members of the Scams and Fake Second Chance Offers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But eBay rairly if EVER uses their email system to warn the members of the Scams and Fake Second Chance Offers!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1336</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1336</guid>
					<description>Hi Seth.
Once legislators taste Internet meat, they won't stop till they've picked the corpse clean. Now &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Seth.<br />
Once legislators taste Internet meat, they won&#8217;t stop till they&#8217;ve picked the corpse clean. Now <em>that</em> scares me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1333</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1333</guid>
					<description>wow, some stupid comments on here. Yeah, if you really think the big bad evil isp's are gonna block your content, you really have been smoking the ganja a bit too much. That would be 
A) Stupid
B) A Business Killer
C) Punishable by existing law
D) Covered in another provision of the TeleCom Reform act besides Net Neutrality.

And has anyone stopped to think about the "Tiered Internet" you keep complaining about? First, the tiers are what you have now, and faster. If they developed a new infrastructure for the bandwidth hogs and charged them extra to access that, so freaking what? They pay if they want and now they are off the other lane and free up bandwidth the rest can use. If you stay in the "slow lane" you are no worse off than you are now, in fact, you are probably better off since you no longer have to compete with the bandwidth hogs. 

If NN passses, then you will only ever have that same single slow lane but you will also have to compete with the bandwidth hogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, some stupid comments on here. Yeah, if you really think the big bad evil isp&#8217;s are gonna block your content, you really have been smoking the ganja a bit too much. That would be<br />
A) Stupid<br />
B) A Business Killer<br />
C) Punishable by existing law<br />
D) Covered in another provision of the TeleCom Reform act besides Net Neutrality.</p>
<p>And has anyone stopped to think about the &#8220;Tiered Internet&#8221; you keep complaining about? First, the tiers are what you have now, and faster. If they developed a new infrastructure for the bandwidth hogs and charged them extra to access that, so freaking what? They pay if they want and now they are off the other lane and free up bandwidth the rest can use. If you stay in the &#8220;slow lane&#8221; you are no worse off than you are now, in fact, you are probably better off since you no longer have to compete with the bandwidth hogs. </p>
<p>If NN passses, then you will only ever have that same single slow lane but you will also have to compete with the bandwidth hogs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1329</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1329</guid>
					<description>Hi Goodman.
Your reading comprehension would be an inspiration to those of Mark's ilk... if they aspired to comprehension.

As Mark's host, I refrained from describing my guest as a specific and odiferous part of the human anatomy (allthough I insist on spelling Mark's name as it was likely printed on his birth certificate).

But it sure feels good seeing &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Goodman.<br />
Your reading comprehension would be an inspiration to those of Mark&#8217;s ilk&#8230; if they aspired to comprehension.</p>
<p>As Mark&#8217;s host, I refrained from describing my guest as a specific and odiferous part of the human anatomy (allthough I insist on spelling Mark&#8217;s name as it was likely printed on his birth certificate).</p>
<p>But it sure feels good seeing <em>you</em> do it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1327</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/08/03/dear-meg-whitman-i-got-your-call-to-action-and-i-have-a-few-suggestions/#comment-1327</guid>
					<description>Marc,

Name-calling isn't usually the best way to make a point... But you don't have a point, do you?

Had you taken the time to digest this article before unleashing your id, you might have noted that BJ isn't endorsing a tiered Internet. He's suggesting that it might be prudent to hold off on legislating until there's an actual problem to legislate against. Every new law has consequences, both intended and otherwise, so it's best to wait until the scope of the issue is fully understood.

Too often, our representatives simply want to look like they're doing &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt;, and we end up with bad laws that we pay for for years to come.

I'm glad that I have British friends, or I might assume that all Brits were ignorant, predjudiced a**holes, like yourself.

Sure, calling you a name undermined my point, but it sure felt good. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Name-calling isn&#8217;t usually the best way to make a point&#8230; But you don&#8217;t have a point, do you?</p>
<p>Had you taken the time to digest this article before unleashing your id, you might have noted that BJ isn&#8217;t endorsing a tiered Internet. He&#8217;s suggesting that it might be prudent to hold off on legislating until there&#8217;s an actual problem to legislate against. Every new law has consequences, both intended and otherwise, so it&#8217;s best to wait until the scope of the issue is fully understood.</p>
<p>Too often, our representatives simply want to look like they&#8217;re doing <i>something</i>, and we end up with bad laws that we pay for for years to come.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that I have British friends, or I might assume that all Brits were ignorant, predjudiced a**holes, like yourself.</p>
<p>Sure, calling you a name undermined my point, but it sure felt good. <img src='http://www.emailbattles.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
