<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Ready To Take On Microsoft&#8230; Almost</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-977</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-977</guid>
					<description>You forgot, it's all the Joooos fault for trying to take over the world, they are going to reverse engineer Intel Chips so that they have establish a Zionist empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot, it&#8217;s all the Joooos fault for trying to take over the world, they are going to reverse engineer Intel Chips so that they have establish a Zionist empire.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-976</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-976</guid>
					<description>john doe with the Evil empire comments, you DO know that not a single macintosh with an Intel chip has been manufactured in the US, right? and that in fact, the vast majority of all computers are made in China? So maybe you can relax and worry about the chinese, and relax about israel for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john doe with the Evil empire comments, you DO know that not a single macintosh with an Intel chip has been manufactured in the US, right? and that in fact, the vast majority of all computers are made in China? So maybe you can relax and worry about the chinese, and relax about israel for now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-975</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-975</guid>
					<description>So, Chris, what kind of change are you proposing that Apple understands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Chris, what kind of change are you proposing that Apple understands?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-974</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-974</guid>
					<description>On thing most of the posters miss in the the whole thing: "Think different". When linux and windows administrators/users say that it cannot change because that is the way it has always been done, then it is, indeed a time for change. Apple seems to understands this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On thing most of the posters miss in the the whole thing: &#8220;Think different&#8221;. When linux and windows administrators/users say that it cannot change because that is the way it has always been done, then it is, indeed a time for change. Apple seems to understands this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-973</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-973</guid>
					<description>The problem with letting people run OS X on their own choice of x86 hardware is you then have an order of magnitude or two explosion in the kinds of hardware that you have to support. Microsoft has long been accustomed to this, and so have the Linux folks, but Apple has not. I don't think it's ready for the kind of effort this would involve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with letting people run OS X on their own choice of x86 hardware is you then have an order of magnitude or two explosion in the kinds of hardware that you have to support. Microsoft has long been accustomed to this, and so have the Linux folks, but Apple has not. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s ready for the kind of effort this would involve.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James K. Lowden</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-972</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-972</guid>
					<description>"Apple is a hardware company."  Digital Equipment thought so too, despite the fact they made the best OS ever.  Look what happened to them.  &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Apple is a hardware company only because it's not a software company.  It could price the OS such that it didn't care whether you by the OS or the machine.  How many it could sell, who knows?  &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; As for drivers, Apple would have to make Darwin freely available again.   Then kernel development could adapt "in the wild", and Apple could cry "but the hardware" all the way to the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple is a hardware company.&#8221;  Digital Equipment thought so too, despite the fact they made the best OS ever.  Look what happened to them.  </p>
<p> Apple is a hardware company only because it&#8217;s not a software company.  It could price the OS such that it didn&#8217;t care whether you by the OS or the machine.  How many it could sell, who knows?  </p>
<p> As for drivers, Apple would have to make Darwin freely available again.   Then kernel development could adapt &#8220;in the wild&#8221;, and Apple could cry &#8220;but the hardware&#8221; all the way to the bank.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-971</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-971</guid>
					<description>@Paul.&lt;br&gt; Keywords: "I can *imagine*..."&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I can also imagine Apple doing what Apple has always done. So would Sun Tzu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul.<br /> Keywords: &#8220;I can *imagine*&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p> I can also imagine Apple doing what Apple has always done. So would Sun Tzu.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john doe</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-970</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-970</guid>
					<description>the only reason Apple uses Intel chips now is for national security. NSA and other agencies have mandated one vendor for all microprocessors on all US-made PCs. Chips are designed in Isreal and designed to be reverse-engineerable and remotely sabotagable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only reason Apple uses Intel chips now is for national security. NSA and other agencies have mandated one vendor for all microprocessors on all US-made PCs. Chips are designed in Isreal and designed to be reverse-engineerable and remotely sabotagable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: toxicfreak</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-969</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-969</guid>
					<description>apple should understand that one way or the other they will get pirated and install on a whitebox the only question is when will it be wide spread .&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; if apple could only see there reality they would storm window monopoly like a wildfire .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apple should understand that one way or the other they will get pirated and install on a whitebox the only question is when will it be wide spread .</p>
<p> if apple could only see there reality they would storm window monopoly like a wildfire .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-968</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/15/opsys_aaejcihhbf_d/#comment-968</guid>
					<description>Let's hope you and Sun Tzu are right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope you and Sun Tzu are right!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
