Comments on: Windows Server beats Red Hat Linux with nearly 20% more uptime http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/12/1150149082_7/ Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing & Viruses from the Front Lines. Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:55:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: BJ Gillette http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/12/1150149082_7/#comment-1141 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:55:49 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/12/1150149082_7/#comment-1141 Hi Steve.<br> Don't blame the messenger. That's Yankee's press release and header, ever-so-slightly modified by Yours Truly.<br> <br> Are we buying it?<br> <br> Are you kidding? <br> <br> Some of our Linux servers have run so long without human touch that we almost forget they're there.<br> <br> In fact, we got in a whole lot of hot water recently when we aired our hair-brained network management theories: http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/opsys_aadighfebb_g/.<br> <br> NEVERTHELESS... they work for *us.* Hi Steve.
Don’t blame the messenger. That’s Yankee’s press release and header, ever-so-slightly modified by Yours Truly.

Are we buying it?

Are you kidding?

Some of our Linux servers have run so long without human touch that we almost forget they’re there.

In fact, we got in a whole lot of hot water recently when we aired our hair-brained network management theories: http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/opsys_aadighfebb_g/.

NEVERTHELESS… they work for *us.*

]]> by: Steve Conklin http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/12/1150149082_7/#comment-1140 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:11:30 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/06/12/1150149082_7/#comment-1140 When read carefully, the statement made seems to be that Windows showed a greater improvement in reliability, not that it is more reliable. When read carefully, the statement made seems to be that Windows showed a greater improvement in reliability, not that it is more reliable.

]]>