Comments on: Spammers Beware: There’s A New Frog In Town.

by: BJ Gillette

Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:36:11 +0000

So I’ve heard.

by: Dest Kraid

Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:50:42 +0000

Okopipi isn’t going anywhere. They might as well give up.

by: BJ Gillette

Fri, 26 May 2006 13:17:22 +0000

@wiskers.
RE: “Your worried that somebody else might be moving in on part of your business and be WAY more effective [snip] you don’t want to actually beat spam because then you’d be obsolete.”

If Okipipi bears fruit without hurting innocent bystanders, we’ll be delighted.

But like we said, there’s a lot you can do while you’re waiting, beyond fuming, spitting and misunderstanding.

by: wiskers

Fri, 26 May 2006 11:28:57 +0000

you wrote an artical like this because

A) You have a deep moral objection to legitimate op out requests that are automated

B) Your worried that somebody else might be moving in on part of your business and be WAY more effective.

Lets face it you don't want to actually beat spam because then you'd be obsolete. Much better to treat the symptoms than to actually cure.

by: Sterken

Wed, 24 May 2006 16:59:08 +0000

“Perhaps it will mitigate the angry, almost sociopathic impulses of the folks who’ve embraced and defended BlueSecurity-style abuse.”

And what abuse would that be?

by: BJ Gillette

Wed, 24 May 2006 08:19:46 +0000

RE: “MAAWG doesn’t have the concept of a “member in good standing” — you’re either a member or you’re not.”

Presumably, therefore, a member is, by definition, a member in good standing.

by: J.D.

Tue, 23 May 2006 18:15:50 +0000

MAAWG doesn’t have the concept of a “member in good standing” — you’re either a member or you’re not.

Personally, I’m glad to see that the idea of unsubscribe reputation is becoming popular. Perhaps it will mitigate the angry, almost sociopathic impulses of the folks who’ve embraced and defended BlueSecurity-style abuse.