<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue Frog/Typepad Timeline MashUp, Warts and All</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-839</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-839</guid>
					<description>Article: Blue Frog or Toadstool?&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; We take a very critical look at the information that Blue Frog is providing. The data simply doesn't make sense. The conclusion is that this is hyperbole in pursuit of an IPO.&lt;br&gt; (http://tqmcube.com/bluefrog.php)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article: Blue Frog or Toadstool?</p>
<p> We take a very critical look at the information that Blue Frog is providing. The data simply doesn&#8217;t make sense. The conclusion is that this is hyperbole in pursuit of an IPO.<br /> (http://tqmcube.com/bluefrog.php)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-838</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-838</guid>
					<description>Gregg Keizer wrote at TechWeb: When asked if he (Eran Reshef) had contacted Six Apart prior to repointing his corporate site, or informed them that other company servers were currently under attack at the time, he only answered "I'm not saying this was the smartest move."&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Reshef said, in retrospect, he should have posted a press release (which he did).&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; He also might have considered dropping an email heads-up to his clients from a back up server.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The BS chief admits he screwed up. So why are his followers so adamant that the decision to foist a BS personal nightmare off on a community of 10 million innocents is someone else's fault?&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Frankly, I am baffled.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; (http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20060506/tc_cmp/187200870)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregg Keizer wrote at TechWeb: When asked if he (Eran Reshef) had contacted Six Apart prior to repointing his corporate site, or informed them that other company servers were currently under attack at the time, he only answered &#8220;I&#8217;m not saying this was the smartest move.&#8221;</p>
<p> Reshef said, in retrospect, he should have posted a press release (which he did).</p>
<p> He also might have considered dropping an email heads-up to his clients from a back up server.</p>
<p> The BS chief admits he screwed up. So why are his followers so adamant that the decision to foist a BS personal nightmare off on a community of 10 million innocents is someone else&#8217;s fault?</p>
<p> Frankly, I am baffled.</p>
<p> (http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20060506/tc_cmp/187200870)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-837</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-837</guid>
					<description>Of course the spammer should be blamed for DDoSing BS.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; BS, however, was incredibly stupid/irresponsible/corrupt to send the attackers to Typepad by redirecting their web traffic. They should be willing to take the blame for that action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the spammer should be blamed for DDoSing BS.</p>
<p> BS, however, was incredibly stupid/irresponsible/corrupt to send the attackers to Typepad by redirecting their web traffic. They should be willing to take the blame for that action.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tero</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-836</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-836</guid>
					<description>I agree with Kraig. I think it's the spammers ddossing blue security who should be blamed. Even if BS made a stupid decision..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kraig. I think it&#8217;s the spammers ddossing blue security who should be blamed. Even if BS made a stupid decision..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kraig</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-835</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/10/spam_aadgabfbah_ah/#comment-835</guid>
					<description>Considering typepad and 6apart notices a DDoS attack BEFORE BS switched their domain to point to the blog, it seems that the DNS change wasn't solely the cause of Typepad and Co. being brought down. I don't agree with passing off a DDoS attack to a third party unnaware, but it seems that it wasn't strickly their fault.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; And shouldn't the finger be pointed at the person DDoS'ing them in the first place. No matter how bad their reaction was, they wern't the ones causing the problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering typepad and 6apart notices a DDoS attack BEFORE BS switched their domain to point to the blog, it seems that the DNS change wasn&#8217;t solely the cause of Typepad and Co. being brought down. I don&#8217;t agree with passing off a DDoS attack to a third party unnaware, but it seems that it wasn&#8217;t strickly their fault.</p>
<p> And shouldn&#8217;t the finger be pointed at the person DDoS&#8217;ing them in the first place. No matter how bad their reaction was, they wern&#8217;t the ones causing the problem
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
