<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Phishers Don&#8217;t Fear SSL Toolbars</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: whois-phishing.com</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-842</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-842</guid>
					<description>We would like to point out a very important article. It answers the previous comment - We have no way of "verifying" a legitimate content over a fake one.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Anti-phishing toolbars could hit back at phishers very hard - they could learn a lot from this article. It reveals that phishers are currently given a free-hand.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Remember - you read it here first!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; http://www.whois-phishing.com/hot_security_warning_toolbars.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would like to point out a very important article. It answers the previous comment - We have no way of &#8220;verifying&#8221; a legitimate content over a fake one.</p>
<p> Anti-phishing toolbars could hit back at phishers very hard - they could learn a lot from this article. It reveals that phishers are currently given a free-hand.</p>
<p> Remember - you read it here first!</p>
<p> <a href='http://www.whois-phishing.com/hot_security_warning_toolbars.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.whois-phishing.com/hot_security_warning_toolbars.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Melih</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-841</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 19:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-841</guid>
					<description>The inherit vulnerability is the "inability to verify what you see". It is that vulnerability that is being exploited by phishers. We have no way of "verifying" a legitimate content over a fake one. The innovation has to be on the ability to verify what you see! Without wishing to be promotional, the tool that does that is called Verification Engine at www.vengine.com (and its free). The SSL is not content-aware, Verfication Engine uses Content-aware certificates called "Content Verification Certificates" for legitimate web content. I hope this is useful information about what the problem with phishing is and a solution for it.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; thanks&lt;br&gt; Melih</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inherit vulnerability is the &#8220;inability to verify what you see&#8221;. It is that vulnerability that is being exploited by phishers. We have no way of &#8220;verifying&#8221; a legitimate content over a fake one. The innovation has to be on the ability to verify what you see! Without wishing to be promotional, the tool that does that is called Verification Engine at <a href='http://www.vengine.com' rel='nofollow'>www.vengine.com</a> (and its free). The SSL is not content-aware, Verfication Engine uses Content-aware certificates called &#8220;Content Verification Certificates&#8221; for legitimate web content. I hope this is useful information about what the problem with phishing is and a solution for it.</p>
<p> thanks<br /> Melih
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kj</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-840</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 20:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/05/09/phish_aadgbjfddf_gc/#comment-840</guid>
					<description>i wondered if they tryed google's solution. it works pretty well becuase it shows a pop up in stead of a little light. ive never gotten a false reading from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wondered if they tryed google&#8217;s solution. it works pretty well becuase it shows a pop up in stead of a little light. ive never gotten a false reading from it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
