According to the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), fewer than 40% of health care providers use the cost-saving conveniences of email to communicate with their patients.
The vast majority of physicians won’t correspond with patients because they’re afraid they’ll:
- be innundated with stupid questions;
- respond too late to an emergency;
- be sued for malpractice;
- be sued for violating privacy laws, and;
- never be reimbursed for services.
Stupid questions, email malpractice and emergency response can be dealt with through a decent patient email agreement.
The University of Washington’s Agreement for Email Correspondence transfers all risks to those patients who insist on using email:
Patients should understand that there are known and unknown risks that may affect the privacy of their personal health care information when using email to communicate. Those risks include, but are not limited, to:
- Email can be forwarded, printed, and stored in numerous paper and electronic forms and be received by many intended and unintended recipients without my knowledge or agreement.
- Email may be sent to the wrong address by any sender or receiver.
- Email is easier to forge than handwritten or signed papers.
- Copies of email may exist even after the sender or the receiver has deleted his or her copy.
- Email service providers have a right to archive and inspect emails sent through their systems.
- Email can be intercepted, altered, forwarded, or used without detection or authorization.
- Email can spread computer viruses.
- Email delivery is not guaranteed.
As most medicos know, legalities are only as binding as a judge sees fit… especially with the long shadow cast over the health business by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
Not only has the Act made it really hard to stay out of a courtroom, but health pros are having more and more trouble keeping up with HIPAA’s requirements.
In The State of HIPAA Privacy and Security Compliance [pdf], AHIMA claims that the number of hospitals and health systems who believe they are at least 85% compliant with the privacy and security rules of HIPAA dropped from 91% to 85% in one year.
The drop from 2005 to 2006 is largely attributed to lack of upper management support, expressed primarily through reduced budgets for staff training.
At the same time, over half reported upgrading computer security. The top five upgrades:
| Firewall | 40.40% |
| Anti-virus/spyware/spam | 38.20% |
| Data back-up technologies | 30.20% |
| Remote ID and authentication | 19.90% |
| Single sign-on | 15.00% |
In other words, half of the 1100 survey respondents improved security, while the other half didn’t. And that’s at hospitals and health systems.
Imagine a non-system doctor’s office, with less management, less training, and little or no security expertise. What would you do?
Assuming your doc can crawl over the privacy and security hurdles, there’s still the question of reimbursement for the doctor’s services.
Luckily, that can be done the same way a doc has always handled dispensing medical advice over the phone. The nurse sets an appointment.
Nevertheless, there’s still hope. Hand your doctor the reading list that follows, take two aspirin, and email ‘em in the morning.
Email Battles Backgrounder:

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 28th, 2006 at 5:00 pm
sprintvm
I have a professor friend who will tell you that the best reason not to interact with students via email (I know the article refers to patients, but I think the same logic applies) is the sheer number of stupid questions they’ll ask over email that they’d never dream of asking in person. She’s absolutely innundated.
April 28th, 2006 at 5:06 pm
MVP
tech support’s bad too, still beats listening to the idiots.
April 29th, 2006 at 9:01 am
Montage
As much as I hate to admit it, I guess I sorta understand why doctors are so !@#$ difficult to reach.
April 29th, 2006 at 9:05 am
Mailman
Before they do anything else, doctors make you sign a release form. I don’t see why that wouldn’t work for email too. If they’re worried about billing, there’s got to be a way for them to charge time spent.
April 30th, 2006 at 7:25 pm
Phil
I can’t imagine how many emails a doctor would have to respond to once they started.
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:10 pm
Nan Schwarz
Or, doctors could exchange secure email by downloading a simple desktop solution like Essential Taceo, that integrates with Outlook. All their patients have to do is download the same software (free) and email exchange can be made while following compliance guidelines. Read more:http://www.essentialsecurity.com/products.htm
June 13th, 2008 at 3:53 am
Dan
the word outlook and privacy should NEVER be included together. That makes me shudder.