<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hotmail Delivery Problems Are Not Like Yahoo Mail&#8217;s</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Thorne Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-745</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-745</guid>
					<description>Although this is not a case of greylisting, it delivers some messages with a slower speed rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this is not a case of greylisting, it delivers some messages with a slower speed rate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-744</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-744</guid>
					<description>DBarclay, plug hotmail.com into the Mail Server Profiler (http://www.trimmail.com/news/tools/) a few times, and you'll see that the first IP address for each MX record times out every single time. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; If they were greylisting early in the SMTP conversation, you'd expect to see a temporary SMTP deferral. They may be greylisting after they've determined the sender's and recipient's email addresses, but it doesn't look like they're doing it during the initial connection.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; It may be that these IPs are only for outgoing mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DBarclay, plug hotmail.com into the Mail Server Profiler (http://www.trimmail.com/news/tools/) a few times, and you&#8217;ll see that the first IP address for each MX record times out every single time. </p>
<p> If they were greylisting early in the SMTP conversation, you&#8217;d expect to see a temporary SMTP deferral. They may be greylisting after they&#8217;ve determined the sender&#8217;s and recipient&#8217;s email addresses, but it doesn&#8217;t look like they&#8217;re doing it during the initial connection.</p>
<p> It may be that these IPs are only for outgoing mail&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DBarclay</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-743</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadeefedia_di/#comment-743</guid>
					<description>Could Hotmail be engaging in a kind of "grey listing" by having the first IP address for each MX list always closed to incoming traffic?&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The hope might be that a dumb SPAM bot will not use the alternate MX records and give up, while a reasonable/legitimate mail server will try the other MX records and successfully deliver.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; This is slightly different from the other definition of "grey listing" that I have seen: returning a 4xx non-permanent SMTP error on the first connection from an IP, then accepting subsequent connections. The hope is that a "dumb" SPAM bot will just move on and not re-try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Hotmail be engaging in a kind of &#8220;grey listing&#8221; by having the first IP address for each MX list always closed to incoming traffic?</p>
<p> The hope might be that a dumb SPAM bot will not use the alternate MX records and give up, while a reasonable/legitimate mail server will try the other MX records and successfully deliver.</p>
<p> This is slightly different from the other definition of &#8220;grey listing&#8221; that I have seen: returning a 4xx non-permanent SMTP error on the first connection from an IP, then accepting subsequent connections. The hope is that a &#8220;dumb&#8221; SPAM bot will just move on and not re-try.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
