Comments on: State of E-Mail Authentication: SPF Dead, Others on Life Support http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/ Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing & Viruses from the Front Lines. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:12:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Josh http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-2280 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:09:47 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-2280 To the the SPF record comments. I used to be an employee at AppRiver (in Support) and no one there seemed to have any idea whatsoever how SPF seemed to work. In fact the head of Technical Support said, "SPF! That's *soooo* 2004". If you had help with an SPF issue - it was probably me. After they got what they wanted, they laid off their entire afternoon/night support staff the weekend before x-mas with no explanation. AppRiver sucks. To the the SPF record comments. I used to be an employee at AppRiver (in Support) and no one there seemed to have any idea whatsoever how SPF seemed to work. In fact the head of Technical Support said, “SPF! That’s *soooo* 2004″. If you had help with an SPF issue - it was probably me. After they got what they wanted, they laid off their entire afternoon/night support staff the weekend before x-mas with no explanation. AppRiver sucks.

]]> by: Rob http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-742 Mon, 01 May 2006 15:45:39 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-742 GREAT in theory, bad in "real world" setting. Oh well, back to the old drawing board. Try this if your domain is just overloaded with spam.... http://www.appriver.com They are awsome. I think we need to turn spam filtering over to 3 parties. They adapt quickly to the "new technologies" that spammers come up with. GREAT in theory, bad in “real world” setting. Oh well, back to the old drawing board. Try this if your domain is just overloaded with spam…. http://www.appriver.com They are awsome. I think we need to turn spam filtering over to 3 parties. They adapt quickly to the “new technologies” that spammers come up with.

]]> by: BJ Gillette http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-741 Mon, 01 May 2006 13:54:07 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-741 The world is full of good ideas. <br> <br> If SPF isn't broadly adopted enough, it's not worth adopting.<br> <br> Frankly, I don't see it going anywhere. The world is full of good ideas.

If SPF isn’t broadly adopted enough, it’s not worth adopting.

Frankly, I don’t see it going anywhere.

]]> by: Stephen G http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-740 Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:33:28 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/04/20/email_aadedhjgcd_gh/#comment-740 Keep your powder dry? Are you saying SPF is bad, or just not worth the time? Obviously your reader thought it was worth your time. Keep your powder dry? Are you saying SPF is bad, or just not worth the time? Obviously your reader thought it was worth your time.

]]>