The updated calendar extension for Thunderbird, Lightning 0.1, is on the streets. Developers say it’s more stable than previous efforts… supports WebDAV and CalDAV remote sync protocols… and is less likely to eat your data than ever before.
User reactions are upbeat, but they insist on more Outlook-like group scheduling and coordinating, as these users comments on the Lightning Suggestions wiki demonstrate:
- “Shared calendar functionality, similar to how Outlook’s calendar works with M$ Exchange - So users can share a sort-of Global calendar and see each others events.”
- “Not having an integrated calendar/appointment feature is what keeps many of my friends and colleagues from switching over from Outlook to Thunderbird.”
- “Delayed sending of emails by using date/time of a Calender dropdown (similar to Outlook) should be included.”
Another grand desire naturally centers around Microsoft Exchange. One user helpfully suggests that Novell’s freshly open-sourced Exchange connector may clear the road to a total replacement for the Microsoft Outlook-Exchange dynamo.
Beyond that, PDA and cell phoners want whatever device each is using synchronized immediately.
And everybody wants tabs. Email tabs… newsfeed tabs… calendar tabs.
Although we haven’t had time to thoroughly vet the effort, our initial impressions are positive. If we had our druthers, we’d like to see Lightning add drag n’ drop for email-to-calendar, and vice versa. That, and smaller icons.
Meanwhile, Lightning developers are working toward better linkage between tasks and email, iMIP meeting invitation support, and better CalDAV support. Device synchronization isn’t likely to happen till after the release of 0.2.
Are Outlook’s days numbered? Not a chance. Unlike Internet Explorer, maintaining the email client has been a Redmond priority for some time. The loss of Outlook’s market dominance would undoubtedly threaten Exchange as well. And for Redmond, that’s simply unacceptable.
Nevertheless, an extension-enhanced Thunderbird/Lightening client does open new possibilities for that bulk of Exchange 5.5 orphans who are still looking for a new, lighter-weight email client/mailserver combination. Outlook’s vulnerabilities include price, size, limited extensions and the new versions of Exchange.
As we’ve noted before (and below), there are plenty of eager mailserver vendors salivating for a pliable Outlook-alike. And the new Thunderbird with Lightning looka like it might filla the bill.
Email Battles Backgrounder:
- Wolves Circle As Exchange Nears Death(Revised 6 December 2005); Email Battles; 06 December 2005
- Bloated Exchange 12 Begs For Atkins; Email Battles; 22 November 2005
- Exchange SP2 Gotcha: Super-Sized Email; Email Battles; 10 November 2005
- Outlook 2003 Looks Like A Porker; Email Battles; 11 February 2004
- Linux growth stunted without Outlook?; NewsByte; Email Battles; 01 December 2005
- New Mirapoint Message Server aims at Outlook-less Organizations; NewsByte; Email Battles; 30 November 2005

9 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 24th, 2006 at 12:42 pm
trip
Why not just use Outlook?
March 24th, 2006 at 1:53 pm
Jake
“Why not use Outlook?”
1. Cost
2. Security
3. Flexibility
Oh yeah…did I mention cost?
March 24th, 2006 at 2:04 pm
thesperanto
everyone wants something for nothing.
March 24th, 2006 at 2:42 pm
William W. Ferrell
“Everybody wants something for nothing.”
Not quite. Some of us want to run mail servers on reliable platforms, instead of running Exchange on Windows. Some of us want features that work *everywhere*, not just on Windows workstations. Some of us don’t want to pay rediculous licensing fees just to exchange electronic messages with other internet users or perform remedial, basic scheduling tasks.
And don’t forget — some of us are *contributing* to free software, not just leeching it.
March 24th, 2006 at 2:57 pm
worm
Some of you are contributing. The rest of us are leeching.
March 27th, 2006 at 3:48 am
PDA user
And some of us want to synchronize PDAs running Windows Mobile with Mozilla/Thunderbird/Lighting which we are using instead of Outlook which we don’t want to use, even if it is included with PDA.
April 12th, 2006 at 6:08 am
Jack
Well in some countries, the “Great” Microsoft corporation does not sell the Outlook independently … You have to buy the whole office for five times higher price in order to get your outlook and you also get the crap called office 2003 … which I do not use at all …. so, you want outlook 2003? Well you have to buy some more if you want it … there fore I prefer Thunderbird regardles the small cost of independent (english) outlook 2003. That is the major problem!
May 11th, 2006 at 6:32 am
Uffe
“Why not just use Outlook?”
Yet another reason: Because Outlook is not available on Linux.
October 19th, 2009 at 7:05 am
software development company
Cool,
I dont understand why somebody would switch to linux if they are complaining that they want features which are for windows, just makes no sense
Anyway, thanks for the post