http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/ Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing & Viruses from the Front Lines. Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:18:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-517 Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:43:53 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-517 domainkeys and spf adoption is so pathetic that I don't either of them will be missed if they disappear. domainkeys and spf adoption is so pathetic that I don’t either of them will be missed if they disappear.

]]> http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-516 Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:07:58 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-516 People who think that SPF or DomainKeys will stop spam are barking up the wrong tree. They're sender authentication technologies, and if spammers use their own domains in the sender address, neither of these technologies will prevent their spam from coming through. SPF and DomainKeys are designed to stop sender address forgery, not spam. People who think that SPF or DomainKeys will stop spam are barking up the wrong tree. They’re sender authentication technologies, and if spammers use their own domains in the sender address, neither of these technologies will prevent their spam from coming through. SPF and DomainKeys are designed to stop sender address forgery, not spam.

]]> http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-515 Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:03:49 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/23/spam_aadjgcaicd_ih/#comment-515 Why these companies do they continue even to talk about this? Is it just to do the look that they are concerned and serious on the subject of the problems? Why these companies do they continue even to talk about this? Is it just to do the look that they are concerned and serious on the subject of the problems?

]]>