<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL, Yahoo Follow Bill Gates: We Don&#8217;t See No Stinkin&#8217; Spam.</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mick4394</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-464</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-464</guid>
					<description>I agree with Big Red on this one. The end game will be USPS, which is quickly "whithering on the vine". It would make too much sense to just let it die. Email is just the shot in the arm that USPS needs to remain relevant, and keep all those valuable employees on the payroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Big Red on this one. The end game will be USPS, which is quickly &#8220;whithering on the vine&#8221;. It would make too much sense to just let it die. Email is just the shot in the arm that USPS needs to remain relevant, and keep all those valuable employees on the payroll.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Big Red</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-463</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-463</guid>
					<description>If you're gonna use the Post Office analogy, then take it to its logical end.  That would mean there'd be several different classes and rates of email: First-class email, Standard Mail email (junkmail), Periodical rate for all those e-pubs and Book Rate for email with big attachments. Why, I bet the US Postal Service would be more than willing to help out with the management of such a system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re gonna use the Post Office analogy, then take it to its logical end.  That would mean there&#8217;d be several different classes and rates of email: First-class email, Standard Mail email (junkmail), Periodical rate for all those e-pubs and Book Rate for email with big attachments. Why, I bet the US Postal Service would be more than willing to help out with the management of such a system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-462</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-462</guid>
					<description>We  didn't mention that AOL has renamed the paid version of don't-call-it-spam. Now it's Certified Mail, just like the Post Office.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The gatekeepers have morphed into ticket agents.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Luckily for them, active-and-honest AOL/Yahoo email subscribers are frequently anchoring the lower echelons of the bell curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We  didn&#8217;t mention that AOL has renamed the paid version of don&#8217;t-call-it-spam. Now it&#8217;s Certified Mail, just like the Post Office.</p>
<p> The gatekeepers have morphed into ticket agents.</p>
<p> Luckily for them, active-and-honest AOL/Yahoo email subscribers are frequently anchoring the lower echelons of the bell curve.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ted Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-461</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/02/09/spam_aaciejadgb_hg/#comment-461</guid>
					<description>Refreshing to see a kindred opinion on this. Here is what I wrote in Fraud, Phishing and Financial Misdeeds:&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/02/what-are-security-implications-of-pay.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshing to see a kindred opinion on this. Here is what I wrote in Fraud, Phishing and Financial Misdeeds:</p>
<p> <a href='http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/02/what-are-security-implications-of-pay.html' rel='nofollow'>http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/02/what-are-security-implications-of-pay.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
