Comments on: Combine 3 Free Tools for a Complete Windows Registry Fix http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/ Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing & Viruses from the Front Lines. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:34:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: registry cleaner http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-2992 Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:26:16 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-2992 I recently purchased a registry cleaner and my pc is running much better. It use to crash and get errors but now i don’t have a problem. I recently purchased a registry cleaner and my pc is running much better. It use to crash and get errors but now i don’t have a problem.

]]> by: pancho http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1533 Thu, 07 Sep 2006 05:14:04 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1533 turbo37: Alright you got me on that. :( Though I'm sure you would have to admit that there are times when purchasing the right software is good for business as well. (Because not everything is life is free) :) turbo37:

Alright you got me on that. :(

Though I’m sure you would have to admit that there are times when purchasing the right software is good for business as well. (Because not everything is life is free) :)

]]> by: turbo37 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1456 Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:25:17 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1456 pancho: Yeah, people who run their entire businesses on free software like Apache, MySQL, Linux, FreeBSD, PHP, etc. sure are idiots! Uh... NOT! :) pancho:

Yeah, people who run their entire businesses on free software like Apache, MySQL, Linux, FreeBSD, PHP, etc. sure are idiots!

Uh… NOT! :)

]]> by: pancho http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1455 Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:23:04 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-1455 I know that one of the criteria for this article was that there was a budget of zero for the applications that would be considered and I can respect that. I do however have a opinion about what you get for free compared to what you pay for. I personally have purchased and use StompSoft's <a href="http://www.stompsoft.com/registry-repair.html" rel="nofollow">Registry Repair </a> and I feel that no freeware application can truly stand up to a fully developed commercial version. At least that's what I think. I know that one of the criteria for this article was that there was a budget of zero for the applications that would be considered and I can respect that. I do however have a opinion about what you get for free compared to what you pay for. I personally have purchased and use StompSoft’s Registry Repair and I feel that no freeware application can truly stand up to a fully developed commercial version. At least that’s what I think.

]]> by: bill harrison http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-449 Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:42:16 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-449 just wanted to say thanks for the regseeker link, there were allmost 1900 issues i deleted on my old windows 98se pc. i,m a die hard and was ready to scrape my old p3 but maybe now i,ll get another year or so out of it, i,m definitly running faster , thanks just wanted to say thanks for the regseeker link, there were allmost 1900 issues i deleted on my old windows 98se pc. i,m a die hard and was ready to scrape my old p3 but maybe now i,ll get another year or so out of it, i,m definitly running faster , thanks

]]> by: je.saist http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-448 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:41:03 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-448 I used to be in favor of jv16's powertools program, until it went proprietary :( thanks for these listings, now I have something that actually appears to work :) I used to be in favor of jv16’s powertools program, until it went proprietary :( thanks for these listings, now I have something that actually appears to work :)

]]> by: Editor http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-447 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:34:41 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-447 From the publisher's site:<br> --- Full Free (FreeShare) ---<br> WinASO RegDefrag Version 1.2<br> Update: Dec 05, 2005 Version: 1.2. <br> (www.winaso.com) From the publisher’s site:
— Full Free (FreeShare) —
WinASO RegDefrag Version 1.2
Update: Dec 05, 2005 Version: 1.2.
(www.winaso.com)

]]> by: Rakhesh http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-446 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:50:37 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-446 I checked up WinASO's RegDefrag, its not free. All they have is a 30-day trial program, and that too has limitations. http://www.winaso.com/index.html I checked up WinASO’s RegDefrag, its not free. All they have is a 30-day trial program, and that too has limitations. http://www.winaso.com/index.html

]]> by: Editor http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-445 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:15:53 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-445 We used two in-service computers that are regularly put through all manner of angst with very little mtce.<br> <br> You can compare your product with those in the article by simply following the links and downloading the software.<br> <br> Good luck. We used two in-service computers that are regularly put through all manner of angst with very little mtce.

You can compare your product with those in the article by simply following the links and downloading the software.

Good luck.

]]> by: APK http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-444 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:59:38 +0000 http://www.emailbattles.com/2006/01/30/opsys_aachffjgia_df/#comment-444 For the tester's reference, a test performed by this gentleman which you can inquire with him about (he has given me written permission to allow this & has done so in the past regarding others testing my registry cleaner vs. those of others out there):<br> <br> Phil Atherton [tecknowledgy@btinternet.com]<br> <br> Whom you can write via email & inquire with regarding this testimony of "APK Registry Cleaning Engine 2002++ SR-7" (latest model) vs. others out there & his test methods + findings, quoted below from March 14th, 2005:<br> <br> --------------------------------<br> <br> Alexander:<br> <br> I've built 2 machines, WinXP Pro SP1 on an Athlon 2800+ system and MediaCentre 2005 on a 3.0GHz P4 system. I had installed Regcleaner 4.3 by Juoni Vuorio on both machines.<br> <br> Regcleaner didn't work on my MediaCentre PC (it is an OEM machine which I have rebuilt a number of times and tried Regcleaner each time but I suspect there's some OEM gubbins in the Windows set-up that's causing some instability) but your cleaner worked on both. I'm not surprised with the APK simple install arrangement.<br> <br> I regularly clean my machines using simple tools, Regcleaner, Norton System Works, X-Setup Pro, Windows Defrag, etc.<br> <br> After running these I immediately tried the APK cleaner to see whether it picked up any additional registry errors, and it found 39! It regularly finds approx 20 more that Regcleaner and takes approx 18 minutes to do the job to Regcleaner's 5 mins. This is what I would expect as I have a large number of apps installed (approx 36 including Office XP Pro, AutoCAD 2004, etc) and is not surprising if the cleaner is to do its job properly.<br> <br> I do believe I can tell the difference in the operating speed of the machine afterwards. (Slight)<br> <br> I am impressed.<br> <br> Phil Atherton<br> <br> Senior Consultant - Communication Systems<br> <br> --------------------------------<br> <br> If you have ANY questions regarding my program, write me by email (address submitted to post here, or just use the one @ the bottom of my posting here) & I can send the program (726kb zipfile with manual install/uninstall directions + .bat file automated installers which you can edit & understand easily to amend them to your own unique install areas (the .dll MUST be a publicly visible one in %WinDir%\system32, & the 2 .reg files for backup tracking of data deleted from the registry must be in %WinDir% & %WinDir%\system32, but the .exe can run from anyplace on your system & is fully self-guiding/intelligent in its operations).<br> <br> BUT, should you have ANY questions? Feel free to write me @:<br> <br> apk4776239@hotmail.com<br> <br> APK<br> <br> P.S.=> I am truly interested in seeing how my work compares with those today, featureset-wise + safety + ease-of-use-wise, as well as accuracy (provided, as I stated above, none of the testing involves injecting .reg files into user's systems first, rigging the results in such tests - this IS possible & I proved it years ago in head-to-head tests vs. another program of this kind, JVRegcleaner)... thank-you! apk For the tester’s reference, a test performed by this gentleman which you can inquire with him about (he has given me written permission to allow this & has done so in the past regarding others testing my registry cleaner vs. those of others out there):

Phil Atherton [tecknowledgy@btinternet.com]

Whom you can write via email & inquire with regarding this testimony of “APK Registry Cleaning Engine 2002++ SR-7″ (latest model) vs. others out there & his test methods + findings, quoted below from March 14th, 2005:

——————————–

Alexander:

I’ve built 2 machines, WinXP Pro SP1 on an Athlon 2800+ system and MediaCentre 2005 on a 3.0GHz P4 system. I had installed Regcleaner 4.3 by Juoni Vuorio on both machines.

Regcleaner didn’t work on my MediaCentre PC (it is an OEM machine which I have rebuilt a number of times and tried Regcleaner each time but I suspect there’s some OEM gubbins in the Windows set-up that’s causing some instability) but your cleaner worked on both. I’m not surprised with the APK simple install arrangement.

I regularly clean my machines using simple tools, Regcleaner, Norton System Works, X-Setup Pro, Windows Defrag, etc.

After running these I immediately tried the APK cleaner to see whether it picked up any additional registry errors, and it found 39! It regularly finds approx 20 more that Regcleaner and takes approx 18 minutes to do the job to Regcleaner’s 5 mins. This is what I would expect as I have a large number of apps installed (approx 36 including Office XP Pro, AutoCAD 2004, etc) and is not surprising if the cleaner is to do its job properly.

I do believe I can tell the difference in the operating speed of the machine afterwards. (Slight)

I am impressed.

Phil Atherton

Senior Consultant - Communication Systems

——————————–

If you have ANY questions regarding my program, write me by email (address submitted to post here, or just use the one @ the bottom of my posting here) & I can send the program (726kb zipfile with manual install/uninstall directions + .bat file automated installers which you can edit & understand easily to amend them to your own unique install areas (the .dll MUST be a publicly visible one in %WinDir%\system32, & the 2 .reg files for backup tracking of data deleted from the registry must be in %WinDir% & %WinDir%\system32, but the .exe can run from anyplace on your system & is fully self-guiding/intelligent in its operations).

BUT, should you have ANY questions? Feel free to write me @:

apk4776239@hotmail.com

APK

P.S.=> I am truly interested in seeing how my work compares with those today, featureset-wise + safety + ease-of-use-wise, as well as accuracy (provided, as I stated above, none of the testing involves injecting .reg files into user’s systems first, rigging the results in such tests - this IS possible & I proved it years ago in head-to-head tests vs. another program of this kind, JVRegcleaner)… thank-you! apk

]]>