<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia takes a swing at integrity</title>
	<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2005/12/06/1133907988_79/</link>
	<description>Spam, Security, Privacy, Spyware, Phishing &#038; Viruses from the Front Lines.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: A. Einstein</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2005/12/06/1133907988_79/#comment-1053</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2005/12/06/1133907988_79/#comment-1053</guid>
					<description>A hundred monkeys at a hundred keyboards are still just a pack of dumb monkeys. But a million monkeys at a million keyboards? Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hundred monkeys at a hundred keyboards are still just a pack of dumb monkeys. But a million monkeys at a million keyboards? Wikipedia.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: per Robert McHenry, former Editor in Chief, the Encyclop&#65533;ia Britannica</title>
		<link>http://www.emailbattles.com/2005/12/06/1133907988_79/#comment-1052</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.emailbattles.com/2005/12/06/1133907988_79/#comment-1052</guid>
					<description>R. McHenry, frmr Editor; Encyclop&#65533;ia Britannica: To put the Wikipedia method in its simplest terms: 1. Anyone, irrespective of expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can submit an article and it will be published. 2. Anyone, irrespective of expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can edit that article, and the modifications will stand until further modified. Then comes the crucial and entirely faith-based step: 3. Some unspecified quasi-Darwinian process will assure that those writings and editings by contributors of greatest expertise will survive; articles will eventually reach a steady state that corresponds to the highest degree of accuracy. Does someone actually believe this? Evidently so. Why? It's very hard to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R. McHenry, frmr Editor; Encyclop&#65533;ia Britannica: To put the Wikipedia method in its simplest terms: 1. Anyone, irrespective of expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can submit an article and it will be published. 2. Anyone, irrespective of expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can edit that article, and the modifications will stand until further modified. Then comes the crucial and entirely faith-based step: 3. Some unspecified quasi-Darwinian process will assure that those writings and editings by contributors of greatest expertise will survive; articles will eventually reach a steady state that corresponds to the highest degree of accuracy. Does someone actually believe this? Evidently so. Why? It&#8217;s very hard to say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
